We have been using resin flow analysis more and more for product launch.
If the deformation is not within the target deformation amount in the analysis, the product shape will be reviewed.
However, there are many cases where the shape of the product cannot be changed significantly due to specifications. Even if the product shape is changed significantly, it cannot be guaranteed that the shape will be within the target deformation amount.
Therefore, as one approach to make full use of the analysis results, we perform an inverse solver analysis.
We perform inverse soli analysis to reconstruct the model.
What is the concept?
If the analysis predicts deformation like model A, our software automatically creates a model with deformation in the opposite direction of A. This model B is what we call an inverse sled model. We call this model B the inverse sled model.
If a mold is created with the shape of Model B, it can be made closer to the reference CAD model even if warpage deformation occurs.
The inverse warp model is a CAD model that ignores the mold design. If there is a problem with the mold configuration in the raw workability study, the amount of reverse warpage can be reduced (i.e., the warpage is estimated to be smaller than that of the actual mold) to clear the problem of raw workability.
This will clear up the problem of biworkability.
Currently, we have received requests to use the CAD model for some automotive parts, and we are considering applying it to various automotive parts in the future.
Other topic
Comments